IT'S MORE TO US, IT'S PERSONAL

Side Bar Form

In a rush? Call us.

(877) 715-9300

"*" indicates required fields

By providing your personal information, you agree to our collection, use, and disclosure of your information as described in our privacy policy. For more details, please review our Privacy Policy.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Experienced Tupelo Premises Liability Lawyer

Protecting the Rights of Victims Throughout Mississippi

In Tupelo, property owners have a legal responsibility to ensure the safety of those who visit their premises. Whether shopping at a new store or dining at your favorite restaurant, you expect these businesses to maintain a safe environment. Unfortunately, accidents can still happen, and navigating the complexities of premises liability laws can be overwhelming. 

What is Premises Liability?

Premises liability is a legal concept that holds property owners and occupants responsible for injuries and accidents that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. This area of law is based on the principle that property owners must take reasonable steps to maintain a safe environment for visitors and adequately warn them of any potential hazards. If they fail to do so, and someone is injured as a result, the property owner may be held liable for the damages.

Premises liability cases are intricate, often involving multiple legal nuances. Having a knowledgeable legal team on your side is crucial for building a strong case and maximizing your chances of receiving fair compensation for your injuries.

What are Considered "Reasonable Actions" in Premises Liability Cases?

In premises liability cases, "reasonable actions" refer to the steps that a prudent property owner would take to ensure their property is safe for visitors. These actions are assessed based on what is deemed reasonable under the circumstances, considering factors such as the type of property, the nature of the potential hazard, and the foreseeability of harm. Here are some examples of reasonable actions:

Maintaining the Property: This includes regularly inspecting the premises for potential hazards like broken stairs, uneven flooring, malfunctioning lighting, or leaking substances. Owners must also address these issues promptly upon discovery or notification.

Warning of Existing Hazards: If a hazard cannot be immediately fixed, the property owner is responsible for warning visitors about it. This might involve placing signs near wet floors, marking uneven pavement, or indicating areas under construction.

Safety Protocols and Training: Implementing safety protocols and ensuring that employees are trained to recognize and address potential hazards can prevent accidents. This includes training staff on proper spill cleanup procedures and emergency response plans.

Security Measures: In some cases, property owners may need to implement additional security measures to deter criminal activity or ensure visitor safety. This could involve proper lighting in parking lots, security cameras, or fencing around a pool area.

Activities on the Property: The type of business or activity conducted on the property can also influence what's considered "reasonable." For instance, a grocery store might be expected to have a higher standard of cleanliness compared to a construction site.

Compliance with Building Codes and Regulations: Property owners must comply with local building codes and safety regulations, which set minimum standards for property maintenance and safety features. Non-compliance can be considered negligence.

It's important to remember that "reasonable actions" don't equate to guaranteeing a completely accident-free environment. However, by taking these steps, property owners demonstrate they are actively managing potential risks and fulfilling their duty to provide a reasonably safe space for visitors.

Types of Hazards Covered

In Mississippi personal injury law, various types of hazards can form the basis for premises liability claims. Property owners and occupiers have a legal obligation to ensure their premises are safe for visitors by addressing potential dangers. Failure to do so can result in accidents and injuries, which may lead to liability claims.

Common Types of Premises Liability Cases

Premises liability cases encompass a range of scenarios where individuals suffer harm due to unsafe conditions on someone else's property. Understanding these common types of cases can help victims recognize when they may have a valid legal claim.

These are among the most common premises liability cases and occur when a person slips, trips, or falls due to hazardous conditions such as wet floors, uneven surfaces, poor lighting, or cluttered walkways. For example, slipping on a spilled liquid that isn't promptly cleaned up or tripping over an uneven sidewalk can lead to significant injuries.

Property owners and businesses are responsible for providing adequate security measures to protect visitors and patrons from foreseeable harm caused by criminal acts. Negligent security cases arise when inadequate lighting, malfunctioning security cameras, or lack of security personnel contribute to assaults, robberies, or other violent incidents on the premises. Victims of such incidents may seek compensation for physical injuries, emotional trauma, and financial losses resulting from the lack of proper security measures.

Swimming pool accidents are particularly tragic and often involve drownings or severe injuries, especially when safety precautions are neglected. Property owners must adhere to strict safety standards, including installing secure fencing, maintaining proper signage, and providing supervision where necessary. Failure to comply with these requirements can lead to devastating consequences, making property owners liable for damages in the event of accidents involving pools or other bodies of water on their premises.

Children are naturally curious and may be particularly vulnerable to hazards on others' property. Property owners have a heightened responsibility to anticipate and mitigate potential dangers that could attract children, such as unsecured swimming pools, abandoned construction sites, or dangerous machinery. 

The attractive nuisance doctrine often applies in these situations, holding property owners liable for injuries sustained by children who trespass onto their property due to the presence of an enticing hazard. By implementing proper safety measures and precautions, property owners can help prevent accidents and protect children from harm.

A variety of circumstances - most commonly falls and auto wrecks - can cause head injuries. TBI, or traumatic brain injuries, can be partially or entirely debilitating, making it impossible for you to continue your career, family life, or hobbies. If you’ve suffered a head injury, call us. Let us help you seek justice and improve your quality of life. 

Property owners can be held liable if their pets attack or bite someone on their property. This is particularly relevant if the owner knew the animal was dangerous and failed to take appropriate precautions.

In each of these scenarios, proving liability often hinges on demonstrating that the property owner knew or should have known about the hazardous condition and failed to take reasonable steps to address it. Seeking legal counsel from experienced Wettermark Keith Tupelo premises liability attorneys can help injured individuals navigate the complexities of these cases and pursue fair compensation for their injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

What is Comparative Fault?

In Mississippi, premises liability cases are governed by comparative fault laws, which determine the degree of responsibility each party bears for an accident. Under this principle, if an injured party is found partially responsible for their own injuries, their compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault. This acknowledges that accidents can result from the actions or negligence of both the injured party and the property owner or occupier.

For example, in a slip and fall case, if it is determined that the injured person was 20% at fault for being distracted and not watching where they were walking, while the property owner was 80% at fault for failing to repair a known hazard, the injured person's compensation would be reduced by 20%.

Mississippi applies the "pure comparative negligence" rule, meaning that even if the injured party is predominantly at fault (e.g., 99%), they can still recover damages, though reduced by their percentage of fault. An experienced attorney will work diligently to maximize your compensation by ensuring fault is appropriately measured and presenting a strong case on your behalf.

Statute of Limitations for Premises Liability Cases

In Mississippi, the statute of limitations varies depending on the type of claim and circumstances surrounding the injury. In premises liability cases:

Personal Injury: The injured party typically has three years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit against the property owner or occupier.

Wrongful Death: If the premises liability incident results in a fatality, the deceased person's family members usually have three years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim.

It's crucial to be aware of and adhere to these time limits. Failing to file within the statute of limitations can result in the loss of the right to seek compensation through the court system. Seeking legal counsel promptly after an injury is essential to ensure that all deadlines are met and that your rights are protected.

Proving Liability in Premises Liability Cases

Proving liability in premises liability cases requires establishing that the property owner or occupant was negligent and that this negligence directly caused the injury. To successfully prove liability, four key elements must be demonstrated:

Property owners have a duty to ensure their premises are safe for visitors. This duty varies depending on the visitor's status (invitee, licensee, or trespasser). Invitees, such as customers in a store, are owed the highest duty of care, while trespassers are owed the least.

If a property owner fails to take reasonable steps to maintain safe conditions or adequately warn visitors of potential hazards, they may be considered to have breached their duty of care. Examples include not fixing a broken stair, failing to clean up a spill, or neglecting to post warning signs about a known danger.

The injured party must prove that the property owner's breach of duty directly caused their injury. This means establishing a clear link between the hazardous condition and the accident that resulted in the injury.

The injured party must demonstrate that they suffered actual damages as a result of the accident. This can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other related costs.

These elements must be clearly demonstrated to establish a valid premises liability claim and secure compensation for the injured party. By working with an experienced premises liability attorney, you can ensure that each of these elements is thoroughly investigated and effectively presented in your case.

These elements must be clearly demonstrated to establish a valid premises liability claim and secure compensation for the injured party. By working with an experienced premises liability attorney, you can ensure that each of these elements is thoroughly investigated and effectively presented in your case.

Negligence is the foundation of premises liability cases. It involves the failure of a property owner to exercise reasonable care in maintaining their property, resulting in an unsafe condition that causes harm to a visitor.

This could include neglecting to repair a broken step, failing to secure loose handrails, or ignoring other foreseeable hazards that could cause harm to visitors. By demonstrating such negligence, plaintiffs can argue that their injuries were a direct result of the property owner's failure to maintain a safe environment. Establishing this connection is crucial for holding the property owner accountable and securing compensation for the injuries sustained.

Documenting the Incident

Documenting the incident thoroughly is crucial in a premises liability case. Accurate and detailed documentation can significantly strengthen your claim by providing clear evidence of the hazardous conditions and the resulting injuries. Key pieces of evidence may include: 

The Role of Negligence

By meticulously documenting the incident, you create a robust foundation for your premises liability claim. This comprehensive evidence can significantly enhance your attorney's ability to negotiate a fair settlement or present a compelling case in court.

Medical records detailing the extent of injuries

Photographs or videos of the hazardous condition or accident scene

Incident reports filed with the property owner or manager

Witness statements corroborating the events leading to the injury

Write a detailed account of the incident that includes the time, date, weather conditions, and any conversations you had with the property owner or managers after the accident

Person fell laying on floor in premises liability case

How Can a Premises Liability Attorney Help?

A premises liability attorney provides essential support by thoroughly investigating accidents to determine liability and gathering critical evidence like witness statements and expert opinions. With this groundwork, they craft a strong legal strategy aimed at negotiating fair compensation with insurance companies, covering medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. If negotiations fail to secure a satisfactory settlement, the attorney is prepared to advocate for their client in court, presenting compelling arguments and evidence of the property owner's negligence

Throughout the process, they offer guidance and representation, ensuring their client's rights are protected and maximizing their chances of obtaining the compensation they deserve. An experienced Wettermark Keith premises liability attorney will help you understand the legal complexities effectively and seek justice for injuries sustained due to hazardous property conditions.

Stars-WettermarkKeithStyleGuide_Icon1_041822

Our 3-Step Process

Connect With Us:

Call our office at (877) 715-9300 or use our online form to arrange a no-cost, no-obligation consultation with our Tupelo legal team.

We Assess Your Case

In our initial review, our experienced Tupelo legal team will analyze the details of your case and map out potential strategies. If you've experienced an injury due to negligence, we’ll assign one of our expert personal injury attorneys to handle your case.

We Defend Your Rights

As one of the Southeast’s top personal injury firms, Wettermark Keith is fully committed to advocating for your rightful compensation and recovery. If an injury has disrupted your life, let our dedicated Tupelo attorneys seek justice on your behalf.

Frequently Asked Questions

First, seek immediate medical attention to diagnose and treat any injuries, and obtain medical records as evidence. Report the incident to the property owner or manager and request an incident report. Document the scene by taking clear photographs and videos of the hazardous condition and surrounding area. Collect contact information and statements from any witnesses. Preserve any physical evidence, such as torn clothing or damaged personal items. Write a detailed account of the incident while the details are fresh in your mind, noting the time, date, and conditions. Finally, consult an experienced premises liability attorney to understand your rights and ensure you receive fair compensation for your injuries.

If you were injured due to a hazard on someone else's property and the property owner's negligence contributed to the accident, you may have a valid claim.

Generally, you cannot claim compensation for injuries sustained while trespassing, except under certain circumstances such as if the property owner engaged in willful or wanton misconduct or if the injured party is a child and the attractive nuisance doctrine applies.

Property owners may argue that the hazard was open and obvious, that the victim was partially at fault, or that they took reasonable steps to prevent accidents.

The statute of limitations for premises liability claims in Tupelo is typically three years from the date of the accident, but it's essential to consult with a lawyer to ensure timely filing.

No Recovery, No Fee - Guarantee!

At Wettermark Keith, we understand the overwhelming financial and emotional stress that can arise from accidents and injuries occurring on someone else's property. To ensure that you can seek the justice and compensation you deserve without additional financial strain, we offer our services on a contingency fee basis. This means you only pay legal fees if we successfully secure compensation for you. By choosing this approach, we aim to minimize your financial risk and provide peace of mind, allowing you to focus on your recovery while we handle the legal complexities of your premises liability case.

Call a Wettermark Keith Premises Liability Lawyer to Discuss Your Case

Navigating premises liability laws in Tupelo can be complex, but with the right legal representation, you can protect your rights and pursue justice. If you have been injured due to a hazardous condition on someone else's property, consult with an experienced premises liability attorney to ensure your rights are protected and to receive the compensation you deserve.

At Wettermark Keith™, we have an excellent reputation as one of the most accomplished personal injury firms in the country. We offer a diverse range of practice areas, including personal injury cases, auto wrecks, trucking wrecks, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, on-the-job injuries, social security, and VA disability, to name just a few. At Wettermark Keith, we believe in taking cases personally. Our purpose is to practice with care and compassion - to tell our clients' stories and make their voices heard. We achieve this by building strong relationships based on constant communication and an unwavering dedication to truth and trust.

Wettermark Keith was extremely professional and helpful. This personal injury law firm helped my husband over 10 years ago when he fell and broke his foot on vacation. I called them first because I liked their TV commercials. They are very nice people and I would call them again if I needed a lawyer.

- Juanita

Law firm Wettermark Keith has exceeded my expectations! I recommend these lawyers to anyone and everyone I come across. Their commitment to their clients is outstanding. Communication is easy. And I got my settlement very fast. I definitely recommend working with Lee Hawker. He is very gracious and kind. He looked out for me and my family and went above and beyond for us. I’m very grateful!

- Alexa

My personal embattlement with the Social Security Administration went downhill. From a personal recommendation, I reached out to Wettermark Keith law firm. Brian Smith and his team took my case and throughout the whole process, I felt more than just another number. Frequent updates were provided, and emphasis was placed on ensuring all needed documentation was in place. In the end, the accident case resulted in a favorable victory. A big thank you to my lawyer Brian Smith and the team at Wettermark Keith for the hard work throughout the entire personal injury process.

- Dallas

I had the pleasure of working with Mr. Mark English at Wettermark Keith law firm after my car accident in December 2021. He was very thorough in everything, did a wonderful job of explaining everything that was happening, and was super easy to get in touch with when I needed him. I never had a question that was left unanswered by this lawyer. He's very kind and patient, and he made the personal injury claims process so easy for me. I absolutely recommend him, it was a pleasure working with him!

- Rose

I am so elated that I utilized Mr. Muhammad Abdullah’s services. In the beginning, he told me the compensation that I would receive for my personal injury claim and I actually received more than that! After my car wreck (in my brand-new vehicle), I was actually surprised that I was in the pain that I was in. Mr. Abdullah made sure I saw the necessary people for therapy and worked hard to get me back into my car after the accident. I felt that he was diligent, listened to my concerns, and quickly got me back in my car and compensated! I will be utilizing Mr. Abdullah again and again, anytime I ever have to hire a lawyer.

- Madinah